Louisiana Personal Injury Lawyer Blog
A recent decision from the Louisiana Court of Appeal has shed light on the nuanced boundary between whistleblowing and misconduct in the workplace. The case, Melancon v. Town of Amite City, involved a police officer terminated for running unauthorized criminal background checks and lying about it. While the officer claimed he was acting as a whistleblower, the court ultimately upheld his termination, raising important questions about the limits of whistleblower protection and the importance of adhering to internal policies and procedures.
Gerald Melancon, a police officer in Amite City, Louisiana, was fired after it was discovered he had used police databases to run unauthorized background checks on various individuals, including city council members, fellow officers, and even his own wife. Melancon claimed he was investigating potential corruption within the department and that he had reported his concerns to his superiors and the FBI. He argued his termination was retaliation for his whistleblowing activities.
However, the evidence showed that Melancon had repeatedly lied about conducting background checks during the department’s internal investigation. The police chief testified that Melancon was fired primarily for his dishonesty and unauthorized use of the databases, not for any alleged whistleblowing.
The trial court dismissed Melancon’s claims under the Louisiana Whistleblower Statute (LWS), and the Court of Appeal affirmed this decision. The court emphasized that to be protected under the LWS, an employee must prove they were terminated for disclosing an actual violation of state law, not just a good faith belief of wrongdoing.
In this case, the court found that Melancon failed to provide sufficient evidence to prove the alleged corruption within the department. Moreover, the evidence supported the conclusion that he was fired for misconduct in conducting unauthorized background checks and lying about it, not for his contact with the FBI.
Things to Remember:
- Whistleblower Protection is Not Absolute: While the LWS provides crucial protection for employees who report illegal activities in the workplace, it’s not a blanket shield for any and all actions an employee might take.
- Evidence of Actual Violation is Necessary: To claim whistleblower protection, an employee must prove an actual violation of the law occurred, not just a suspicion or belief.
- Honesty and Compliance with Policies: Employees must adhere to internal policies and procedures even when acting with good intentions. Dishonesty and unauthorized actions can undermine an employee’s credibility and jeopardize their whistleblower protection.
- Employer’s Motivation Matters: The court focused on the employer’s motivation for the termination. If the termination is primarily based on the employee’s misconduct rather than their whistleblowing activities, it’s less likely to be considered retaliation.
The Melancon case serves as a cautionary tale for both whistleblowers and employers. While whistleblowers play a vital role in exposing wrongdoing and promoting transparency, they must act within the bounds of the law and company policies. On the other hand, employers must ensure they don’t retaliate against employees for legitimate whistleblowing activities.
If you believe you’ve been retaliated against for reporting illegal activity in the workplace, it’s critical to consult with an experienced employment lawyer. They can help you understand your rights under the LWS, assess the strength of your case, and guide you through the legal process.
Additional Sources: GERALD MELANCON, JR. VERSUS TOWN OF AMITE CITY
Written by Berniard Law Firm
Other Berniard Law Firm Blog Articles on Whistleblowers: Employee Termination Upheld for Unauthorized Vehicle Use and Dishonesty and Be Careful Whistleblowers: Louisiana Court Upholds dismissal of Qui Tam Action