Understanding the Finality of Workers’ Compensation Settlements

pexels-pixabay-261621-1024x768Navigating the workers’ compensation system can be overwhelming when you’ve been injured on the job. You may be tempted to accept a quick settlement to cover immediate medical bills and lost wages. However, it’s crucial to understand the long-term implications of such a decision. A recent Louisiana case highlights the importance of carefully considering settlement agreements in workers’ compensation claims.

Benny Hernandez was injured at work in 2014. He initially filed a workers’ compensation claim, represented by an attorney, and reached a settlement with his employer and its insurer. The settlement was approved by a workers’ compensation judge, and Hernandez’s claim was dismissed with prejudice.

However, a year later, Hernandez filed another claim related to the same injury. His employer and insurer responded with a peremptory exception of res judicata, arguing that the matter had already been resolved. The court agreed and dismissed Hernandez’s second claim.

Legal Principles at Play

  • Res Judicata: This legal doctrine prevents the same parties from relitigating a matter that has already been decided by a court. Once a final judgment is rendered, it’s generally conclusive and binding on the parties.
  • Compromise: In the context of workers’ compensation, a compromise is a settlement agreement between the injured worker and the employer/insurer. If approved by a judge, it has the same finality as a court judgment.

The Louisiana Court of Appeal affirmed the dismissal of Hernandez’s second claim, upholding the principle of res judicata. The court emphasized that Hernandez had entered into a valid compromise agreement, which released his employer and insurer from further liability related to the injury.

Hernandez argued that the settlement was “unfair” and signed under duress. However, the court found no evidence of fraud, misrepresentation, or other factors that would invalidate the agreement.

Implications for Injured Workers

This case serves as a stark reminder that workers’ compensation settlements are typically final and binding. Once you sign a settlement agreement, you generally cannot go back and seek additional compensation for the same injury, even if your condition worsens or you discover new complications.

Key Takeaways:

  • Understand Your Rights: Before entering into any settlement agreement, it’s crucial to fully understand your rights and the potential long-term consequences of the settlement.
  • Seek Legal Counsel: An experienced workers’ compensation attorney can help you evaluate your case, negotiate a fair settlement, and ensure your rights are protected.
  • Consider Future Medical Needs: When settling a claim, it’s essential to consider not only your current medical expenses but also any potential future treatment or complications related to your injury.
  • Don’t Rush into a Settlement: Take your time to carefully review any settlement offer and make sure you’re comfortable with its terms before signing.

The Hernandez case highlights the importance of approaching workers’ compensation settlements with caution and a full understanding of their implications. While settlements can provide much-needed financial relief, they also close the door on future claims related to the same injury. If you’ve been injured at work, consulting with an attorney can help you make informed decisions and protect your future.

Additional Sources: Benny Hernandez v. ASAP Employment Services, Inc.

Written by Berniard Law Firm

Other Berniard Law Firm Articles on Workers Compensation and Settlements: Louisiana First Court of Appeal Illustrates How Settlement of Claims is Res Judicata Between Litigants in Tangipahoa Workers Compensation Lawsuit and Understanding the Impact of Settlement on Workers’ Compensation Benefits in Louisiana

Contact Information