The Incident & Ensuing Legal Battle:
In the early hours of July 27, 2015, gunfire erupted in the parking lot outside Bella Noche, leaving Ellis with a gunshot wound to the neck. He sued several parties, including Plaza Holdings, the owner of the shopping center where the nightclub was located.
Plaza Holdings sought to dismiss the case, arguing that it had no duty to protect Ellis from the criminal acts of third parties. They pointed to the lease agreement with the nightclub, which stipulated that the tenant was responsible for providing security. Ellis countered, claiming Plaza Holdings had assumed a duty of care for the common areas, including the parking lot, based on the lease terms.
Court’s Decision and Appeal
-
Trial Court’s Ruling: The trial court sided with Plaza Holdings, granting their motion for summary judgment and dismissing the claims against them.
-
Court of Appeal’s Reversal: On appeal, the Court of Appeal reversed the trial court’s decision, highlighting specific lease provisions indicating that Plaza Holdings retained control over the common areas and collected fees for security services. The court found that this could amount to an assumed duty of care, creating a genuine issue of material fact that precluded summary judgment.
Key Takeaways:
This case underscores several critical points:
- Premises Liability & Foreseeability: Property owners are not automatically liable for the criminal acts of third parties on their premises. However, they can be held responsible if they assume a duty of care, and if the criminal act was foreseeable.
- Lease Agreements Matter: The terms of the lease agreement between a property owner and tenant can be crucial in determining liability. In this case, the lease language regarding control and security obligations played a pivotal role in the court’s decision.
- The Importance of Security Measures: Businesses, especially those operating late at night, must take reasonable steps to ensure the safety of their patrons, including providing adequate security.
The Ellis case is a stark reminder that a fun night out can turn tragic in an instant. While the legal complexities of premises liability can be challenging to navigate, the Court of Appeal’s decision sends a clear message: property owners cannot simply contract away their responsibility for safety in common areas. This case is ongoing, and we will continue to monitor its progress as it heads back to the trial court.
Additional Sources: REUBEN ELLIS AND LASUNDA ELLIS VERSUS QUINCY T. QUIETT, BELLA NOCHE, GOOD LIFE PRODUCTIONS, XYZ INSURANCE CO., PLAZA HOLDINGS, AND ABC SECURITY CO.
Written by Berniard Law Firm
Other Berniard Law Firm Blog Articles on Criminal Act Exclusions: Accident Involving Criminal Leads to Questions Relating to Insurance Company Policies and Is a Franchisor Liable for the Criminal Acts of a Third Party?